Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2008, 1:13 pm
Supreme Court's opinion in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:30 pm
ShareThursday’s decision in Financial Oversight & Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
In the words of Lord Justice Bean, “the Court was not, as we read the judgment, purporting to lay down any particular limitations on that power [to retain communications data], as opposed to conditions of access”. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
A little over a month ago (Feb. 12, 2010), the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision in the case of Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:24 am
In West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:34 am
They argued that the key, instead, lay in the vessels converging. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 11:03 am
In Starke v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:59 am
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is a bit different from the typical Supreme Court arbitration case. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
Ultimately, the goal is to make a dispute understandable to a lay person. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:08 am
A recent Ninth Circuit decision in Antonick v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:24 am
The court noted that the employee’s name did appear in multiple documents that contemplated lay-off-selection-candidates prior to the official start of the selection process. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm
The Supreme Court handed down its decision in Schwab v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:09 am
Sweetman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 2:44 pm
First, s.204(2A) lays down a statutory test, “good reason”, the content and effect of which cannot have been changed by the strict approach adopted in recent years by the courts towards failures to comply with the CPR or with the corresponding rules of the Upper Tribunal. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:26 pm
Ted Sichelman, University of San Diego School of Law As Patently-O has described in several posts (here, here, here), the Supreme Court is poised to decide the fate of the patent exhaustion doctrine in Impression Products v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
In today’s case (Thompson v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:30 pm
ShareThursday’s decision in Financial Oversight & Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:50 pm
During its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Commonwealth Edison Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:53 am
In its 30 January ruling in Generics (UK) and others v CMA, the EU Court of Justice (CJEU) in effect upheld the existing approach of the European Commission and EU General Court in relation to the assessment of so-called “reverse payment” patent settlements. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
In the first place, Article 7 of Directive 2006/24 does not lay down rules which are specific and adapted to (i) the vast quantity of data whose retention is required by that directive, (ii) the sensitive nature of that data and (iii) the risk of unlawful access to that data, rules which would serve, in particular, to govern the protection and security of the data in question in a clear and strict manner in order to ensure their full integrity and confidentiality. [read post]
