Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 21,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
That is: The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care (property owners profiting from the public’s presence onsite owe the highest duty of care); The defendant breached that duty of care (failed to take reasonable care, failed to warn patrons of a known/knowable danger, etc.); Defendant’s breach of care caused injury to the plaintiff; The plaintiff suffered some monetary loss as a result of the injury (lost wages, hospital bills, etc.) and… [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
That is: The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care (property owners profiting from the public’s presence onsite owe the highest duty of care); The defendant breached that duty of care (failed to take reasonable care, failed to warn patrons of a known/knowable danger, etc.); Defendant’s breach of care caused injury to the plaintiff; The plaintiff suffered some monetary loss as a result of the injury (lost wages, hospital bills, etc.) and… [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:30 am
It would also be premature to rule on the four CD&R directors’ defense that they could not be liable because they recused themselves and abstained from voting. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:15 am
In holding that a landlord may be liable in those limited circumstances, we adhere to the FHA’s broad language and remedial scope. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:19 am
EasyGroup argued that ATR was jointly liable with the defendants for these alleged infringements, and therefore sought to add ATR to the action (the claim against easyfly began in early 2018).EasyGroup alleged three further acts of infringement against easyfly only: (iii) allowing consumers in the EU to buy easyfly tickets; (iv) direct email marketing to EU-based consumers who provided their email addresses to easyfly; and (v) targeting of the easyfly.com.co website (which is in… [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
The Court dismissed the defendant’s appeal against a refusal to grant an anti-SLAPP motion but allowed the appeal in part against the injunctive relief granted by the Judge. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:27 am
In his multi-count complaint, D’Ascenzo alleged that the defendants had wrongfully barred his efforts to fill an empty third seat on the company’s board by wrongfully disregarding the results of a December 2017 shareholder vote. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
In March 2016, the trial court awarded a final judgment in favor of appellee on its breach of contract claim, finding Atrium and THA were jointly and severally liable for breach of contract and damages. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm
Like other medical malpractice claims, you will need the testimony of an expert witness to prove your case that the defendant doctor departed from the appropriate standard of care. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
Florida has several statutes and remedies in place to hold insurance companies liable for delaying or wrongfully denying claims. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:28 pm
Under New Hampshire premises liability law, owners or occupiers of property can be liable for accidents and injuries that occur because of a dangerous condition on their property. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:12 pm
The court ruled in favor of the defendant because the plaintiff did not present any countering expert testimony to rebut the defendant’s expert. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:28 pm
The only exceptions are if the dog was being used for military or police work and was provoked into defending themselves. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 1:06 pm
The Court indicated that “The Defendants’ motion for costs shall thereafter be dealt with based on the written record filed. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:07 am
§ 3599(f), a reasonable attorney would regard the pursuit of services to investigate a capital defendant’s mental health as “sufficiently important” under Ayestas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:01 am
Plaintiff testified that he was told that “while on [defendant’s] property, [he] worked for [defendant]. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:54 am
” It recognized, however, a possibility that the insured could be held jointly and severally liable for amounts that other defendants may have fraudulently gained, above and beyond the legal fees collected by the insured legal fees (a form of relief that the court termed “excess disgorgement”). [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:27 am
In a recent opinion, Florida’s Supreme Court addressed whether an individual who suffers injuries because of a company’s discharge of toxic pollutants can hold the company liable for their damages. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
It’s a lot to process. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:35 am
But that doesn’t mean they can’t still be held liable for it. [read post]
