Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4961 - 4980
of 21,686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2019, 4:43 am
His decision in People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
Stated otherwise, what is the relationship between trademark awareness and brand strength? [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
One of the most closely-watched cases is Kansas v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:06 am
Supreme Court in” Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 2:59 am
Supreme Court should step in to protect freedom of association against California’s push to obtain donor identities for controversial groups [Ilya Shapiro and James Knight on Cato certiorari amicus brief in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:11 am
This is consistent with the thinking by the Canadian Supreme Court, which upheld a global injunction in 2017 in Google v Equustek. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
However, starting with United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
Canton v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
STATE V. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:32 am
(citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Findings of fact 8 and 10 state: 8. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
STATE V. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
MCMILLAN Opinion of the Court – 2 – summarize: “Their courtship was marked by relapses, hospitalizations, domestic violence and extremely careless behavior. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
STATE V. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
” Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
STATE V. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:20 am
Section 14 of the Lanham Act states that "[a]ny person who believes that he is or will be damaged … by the registration of a mark” may file a petition to cancel the registration. [read post]
