Search for: "Matter of D." Results 4961 - 4980 of 51,712
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
He'd remand for more factual development.As I said, Judge VanDyke has a point. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by WSLL
Park, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: John D. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:31 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
It is free to in-house counsel, R&D professionals and to academics. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs said they were willing to provide specific names under a confidentiality agreement, but they’d have to amend the complaint to do so.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  [The court noted that the journal study seemed to test two lots, not two bottles, but that didn’t matter.] [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Snyder, 277 So. 2d 660, 668 (La. 1973) (on rehearing), rev’d on other grounds, 305 So. 2d 334 (La. 1974); State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Such recusal, opined the Appellate Division, as a matter of due process, "is required only where there exists a direct, personal, substantial or pecuniary interest in reaching a particular conclusion, or where a clash in judicial roles is seen to exist. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 4:36 am
With the presidential election behind us, you may have thought you'd seen the last of the blue and red states -- but they're back! [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:40 am by Florian Mueller
I'm sure the software industry at large, which is firmly on Oracle's side here, will convey that message to its government.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:08 am by Bill
I thought I'd take a look at the Hobby Lobby decision. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 8:28 pm by Jon McLaughlin
" http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2015/1stDistrict/1132832.pdfBest Regards, Jon D. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Handy, (D DC, Feb. 6, 2023), a D.C. federal district court refused to dismiss a criminal case charging ten defendants with conspiracy to block access to a Washington, D.C. abortion clinic. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 7:32 am
He cannot be trusted not to sign a bill that bans abortion, though I'd expect such a bill to contain the 3 exceptions and to start the ban only after some number of weeks. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   As such, the Motion for Remand was granted and the case was sent back to state court.Anyone wishing to see a copy of this Opinion may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Timothy D. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 12:10 pm by Quinta Jurecic
We’d never seen evidence of a state-sponsored attempt for intelligence purposes. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:26 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; John D. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
“[d]ue to uncertainty in the record, the Court must deny the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [read post]