Search for: "Matter of Martin" Results 4961 - 4980 of 5,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
Ryan continues with the Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation (RDI) program, “one of the major themes of this case,” reminding the judge about the ten-paragraph construct from the Nashiri case proposed by Chief Prosecutor Brigadier General Mark Martins, that Judge Pohl adopted. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Harry Graver
United States that Judge Martin Mitchell could simultaneously serve as a judge on the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) and the Air Force’s Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) without violating Congress’s general “dual-officeholding ban” on military officers taking up civilian offices. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Not surprisingly, their total populations were almost identical, but it just didn’t matter. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
    Case Documents:Filing Date Type File Summary 11/26/2020 Application Download Application to the European Court of Human Rights 03/25/2021 Order Download Court communication letter to the Swiss government (in English) 04/26/2021 Order Download Subject matter of the case and questions attached to the communication letter (in French) 07/16/2021… [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But this argument, while desirable as a policy matter, seems incorrect under current constitutional jurisprudence. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:20 am by Daniel Shaviro
  It’s not just a matter of the declining marginal utility of consumption, which merely suggests that others would get more utility out of a dollar than people at the top do. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 9:10 am
No matter our race, color, religion, or creed, we are one America, and we put America first. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am by Marty Lederman
 Sicurella might not have been decided the same way today; a Court more inclined to read statutory text literally might well have concluded that the phrase "war in in any form" means any war, no matter how abstract and hypothetical. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:03 am by Patricia Hughes
Part of the reason for this is accepting the trial judge is entitled to rely on “common sense” and experience, as long as they do not stray into “generalizations or matters not in evidence” (SCJ, para. 7). [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Edward Argar, reiterated that the Government remained of the view that any changes to the law were an issue of conscience for individual Members: “It remains a matter for this House to decide, not the Government, but a Government must implement and work with whatever this Parliament and future Parliaments decide. [read post]