Search for: "People v. House"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 13,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 3:17 am
In Byrd v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:30 am
Indifference in the legal tech/legal ops world (at worse) or naivete (at best) with respect to how their innovation impacts the people on the ground – clients and communities as well as lawyers — bodes ill for the long-term health of the justice system, including legal professionals as well as communities, clients, and citizens. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm
In the circumstances, RH’s house meant that (5)(c) and (5)(d) could not apply as the rooms were not suited for people with those characteristics, so (5)(e) applied and they were entitled for a room for each child. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
People in Glass Houses . . . [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:30 am
There is no reason in principle that these overlapping and intersecting concerns will align in a way that gets the right people in school, trains them in the first (and reasonable cost) ways, and puts them to work helping people and communities in need. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 11:08 am
In People v Eubanks, the defendant caused a fatal accident. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
The changes aimed to curb potential annual expenditure between £3.8m and £9.4m that 700 people a year qualifying for Zambrano rights would trigger in terms of income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 4:52 am
In Yim v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 8:06 am
Are we surprised to find that 6% of people with money to burn on divorce lawyers have a pony? [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Professional Reliance v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:48 am
The case, Communication Workers of America v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In the 2013 case of Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:19 pm
Likewise, the Kentucky Supreme Court held in Hill v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
The fact that it is Christmas makes a discussion, however brief, of Rubies Costume Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 8:47 am
Virginia v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:57 pm
JKMK Consultancy Ltd v Goldie Properties Ltd, QBD, 18 December 2017 (Note on lawtel, otherwise unreported) The run up to Christmas in any housing practice is usually awash with interim injunction threats and preparation. [read post]
