Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 5,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2008, 12:53 pm
Supreme Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:48 am
People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:06 pm
” Whatever you want to call it, Scalia talks about the right of individual people first. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
Update: D.C. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
" Calabresi summarizes this horrifying testimony, which corroborated the Petitioner's testimony about the dangers faced by gay people in Guyana, in a footnote of the opinion. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Ruttenberg v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:39 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 1:35 pm
Hardaway, 2001 MT 252, P 57, 36 P.3d 900 (the scope of a search incident to arrest must be commensurate with underlying purposes, and specific and articulable exigent circumstances are required); People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:59 pm
James Otero, the same judge who rendered the excellent decisions in RIAA cases Elektra v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
The case is Thompson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:30 am
The California Court of Appeals opinion in People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
Karl Llewellyn haunted the Supreme Court this term, when Ali v Federal Bureau of Prisons was handed down on January 22nd. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:38 pm
" The remaining jurors left the courtroom, and the court engaged in the following colloquy with Juror No. 2:"THE COURT: . . . [ ¶] Juror No. 2, you hesitated answering, and you teared up; and it appears that when you did give an answer, ‘yes,' it was in a soft voice and you appear to be obviously emotionally distraught. [ ¶] Is the verdict that you rendered by saying yes to guilt as to counts 2, 3 and 4, is… [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
A simple hypothetical drawn from the facts in San Antonio v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:32 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:10 am
The use of the word "'all,' in and of itself, does not render a warrant a general warrant," particularly, as here, the warrant "reasonably sought all documents with other people's names. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 1:40 am
The full version of the argument, which is set forth at length in Justice Scalia's dissent in McCreary Count v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
I've started to get questions from people about the California initiative, certified as qualified for the ballot yesterday. [read post]
