Search for: "People v. Short" Results 4961 - 4980 of 8,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
It is a short, sensible document, mercifully free of hyperbole and pot-banging. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:31 am by Máiréad Enright
But in a short few years, forced marriage – and indeed the family life of South Asian Britons in particular – has become the subject of a significant regulatory web, involving aspects of family law, child law, the law of vulnerable adults, criminal law and immigration regulation (see Quila v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45). [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Most people, however, are somewhere in the middle. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm by war
Fry Consulting Pty Ltd v Sports Warehouse Inc (No 2) [2012] FCA 81 Share on Facebook [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
The recent Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench decision in K.M.R. v I.W.R., 2020 ABQB 77 highlights developments in the law further expanding entitlement under the nebulous idea of “other cause” which continue to undermine the formerly robust presumption that children over the age of majority have no right to child support (see, for example, Geran v Geran, 2011 SKCA 55 or Szitas v Szitas, 2012 ONSC 1548). [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Josh Blackman
"Constitutional rights are enshrined with the scope they were understood to have when the people adopted them. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
I suspect reasonable people could disagree about the Court’s discrimination holding. [read post]
22 Feb 2025, 8:44 pm by Josh Blackman
In short, Hampton Dellinger has no equitable cause of action to seek reinstatement. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
By Rebecca Tushnet and Eric GoldmanTrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s annual Who Has Your Back report has criticised Amazon and WhatsApp for ‘falling short over privacy. [read post]