Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 4961 - 4980 of 5,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm by Amy Howe
” Kavanaugh – who served as a deputy to Ken Starr during his investigation of then-President Bill Clinton – cited the Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” [This became painfully evident in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   In 1936, when a Court majority stretched its judicial muscles in Ashwander v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am by admin
  Justice Quince is asking the right questions   In effect, Justice Quince is asking the same question at the heart of Kelo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Constitution’s separation of powers. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
Hansen.Salerno, Thomas J.Washington, DC : BeardBooks, c2010.Banks and BankingK1066 .F45 2007International banking regulation / by Carl Felsenfeld.Felsenfeld, Carl.Huntington, N.Y. : Juris Pub., c2007.BiographyE902 .P695 2010The presidency of George W. [read post]
20 May 2008, 5:24 am
Tremendous changes in government power, but no amendments. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]