Search for: "Price v Price"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 18,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court in Quality King v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 7:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 7:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 7:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:45 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:07 am
A cause of action alleging professional malpractice against an accountant accrues upon the client’s receipt of the accountant’s work product (see Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d 1, 8; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541; CRC Litig. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
Bilski v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
Council, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:08 pm
" What neither Easterbrook nor Wright discusses, however, is that the mutual fund industry features a uniquely rigid segregation of sophisticated investors from unsophisticated -- with the former buying one set of investments and the latter buying a very differently priced one -- which neutralizes the possibility that sophisticated sentinels will protectively police for all. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:08 am
Judge Price, writing for the majority, explained that a hearing on a motion for new trial may be necessary to develop a record to show harm from a denial of a motion for continuance, but that doesn't mean it's a sufficient prerequitie to obtaining appellate relief. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:12 pm
In its analysis of the jurisdictional question, the court accepted Verizon’s analysis of the broadband market with respect to the likely negative impact of a two-way pricing model (i.e., a model that allows broadband providers to charge both users and edge providers) on broadband deployment. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
Presiding Judge Keller, along with Judge Price, concurred to say that without the conversation, the defense failed to establish a violation of Article 36.22. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:14 am
In Pfeffer v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 2:17 am
Google Chief Economist Hal Varian explains why the deal won't raise ad prices in the auction. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am
V. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:55 pm
Wetmore v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 4:48 am
Wright v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:35 am
” This project is inspired by the DC Circuit’s opinion in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
