Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 4961 - 4980 of 7,625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am by Kevin
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am by Bruce E. Boyden
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 3:53 pm
Hund went on to argue for the same interpretation of Jones v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
   This figure is relatively often quoted as being the range of the magnitude of the money laundering problem (sometimes “rounded up” to 600 billion)- such as by the FBI. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
COURTS IN HUMAN RIGHTS CASES The court kicked off the new term with the second round of oral arguments in Kiobel v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:18 pm by Lisa Peters
The Scotus blog has gathered previews of the new term, Monday round-up (10/1/12). [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 10:35 pm by Leland E. Beck
TSA Passenger Screening:  The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in an order that most of the media missed, last week denied a follow up writ of mandamus to compel the rulemaking the court ordered in July 2011 in Electronic Privacy Information Center v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
It stands at the centre of the bosses v workers, capital v labour, rich v poor divide and is frequently pressed into service by those who have a political agenda on one side or the other. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 held that despite the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, a state law requiring separate railroad cars for blacks and whites was constitutional as long as the cars were physically the same. [read post]