Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 5,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 6:53 am
The Fourth Amendment protects you from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 8:43 am
This type of behavior can include planting evidence on someone or unlawful search and seizure. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:58 am
They're systematically - and somewhat tediously - working with witnesses from the FBI and Alaska State Troopers to show the jury what their search warrants uncovered in the homes and a trailer belonging to the three defendants, Schaeffer Cox, Coleman Barney and Lonnie Vernon. [read post]
2 May 2014, 3:53 am
It forbids unreasonable searches and seizures, and requires the police to have “reasonable suspicion” that there is a crime underway, based on facts they can articulate. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:27 pm
However, here in FL, we are seeing a new/different type of (in my view) seizure--officers use a "ruse" (not force) to get a person (no warrant nor PC) out of their home...then get "consent" to search. [read post]
10 May 2018, 5:00 am
” Because the driver’s lawyer later filed a motion to suppress, you might also surmise that this traffic stop led to a search, a seizure, and criminal charges, and you might also surmise that the motion was based on the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
Law enforcement would stop trying to search for no reason. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
The case of US v Jones is ostensibly one which turns on the Fourth Amendment (the right against search and seizure). [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:58 am
They're systematically - and somewhat tediously - working with witnesses from the FBI and Alaska State Troopers to show the jury what their search warrants uncovered in the homes and a trailer belonging to the three defendants, Schaeffer Cox, Coleman Barney and Lonnie Vernon. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:10 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices French, Lanzinger, O’Donnell, and O’Neill No: Justices Pfeifer and Kennedy Key Precedent Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution (The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and… [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
(Writs of assistance were search warrants that gave customs officials permission to enter and search any premises for contraband; their use in pre-revolutionary America later motivated the United States’ adoption of the protections from illegal searches and seizures found in the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.) [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
An unreasonable search and seizure? [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:19 pm
Ed Walters asked how current consumer data uses square with a legal doctrine called the Third-Party doctrine, which, according to Wikipedia says “that people who voluntarily give information to third parties—such as banks, phone companies, internet service providers (ISPs), and e-mail servers—have 'no reasonable expectation of privacy.' A lack of privacy protection allows the United States government to obtain information from third parties without a legal… [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:26 pm
” The statute does not also require that the officer be conducting a search, seizure, or arrest at the time of the assault. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
An unreasonable search and seizure? [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 5:33 am
Was a valid search warrant obtained before entering the home? [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:29 am
Relevant to the current matter, applicable precedent held that “an officer’s smelling of unburned marijuana can provide probable cause to conduct a warrantless search and seizure, and that an officer’s smelling of such is not inherently incredible. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:33 pm
” Section 8 states, “Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure” and section 9 says, “Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
That includes, I submit, challenging searches and seizures or statements of the accused, particularly where the government has the burden of going forward and to sustain the search (as in all warrantless searches) or statement. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm
” The FISC hears only from the government, never from a proposed search’s target, so this gatekeeping function is particularly important in ensuring rigor in the process. [read post]
