Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 4961 - 4980 of 10,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2010, 3:44 am by SHG
United States, the decision holding that the use of infrared thermal imaging devices to detect a marijuana grow house constitutes a search and thus requires a warrant. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Zach Abels
He seeks to cripple the civilian agencies—the State Department, USAID, and the United States Institute of Peace—that consolidate combat success into political victory. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:36 am
The standard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is similar to the standard set forth in Arthur A. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed the issue of novelty as an element of an idea theft claim in Wexler v Hasbro. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:18 am by Orin Kerr
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
After extradition to the U.S., they are convicted of, among other things, killing an officer or employee of the United States and using a firearm while committing a crime of violence. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Wallace v United Grain Growers Ltd., 1997 CanLII 332, the Court stated that one additional factor is whether the dismissed employee had been induced to leave previous secure employment. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Schulz
   The 1954 attack has gotten short shrift in coverage of the “Stop the Steal” riot on the Hill. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:42 am
On Friday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in Stewart v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Molea, 201… http://t.co/7bU2rwzcKn -> Mark Lemley Asks: Are Short Patent Trials a Rush to Judgment? [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
After Louis Colon–Gentile was charged “in a seven-count indictment with distribution, receipt, and possession of child pornography, in violation of Title 18, United States Code §§ 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(4)(B), 2252(b)(1) and  2252(b)(2)”, he moved to suppress “physical evidence and statements he made, on the ground that they were obtained in violation of the 4th Amendment. [read post]