Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 6:22 am
And Georgia v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 11:04 pm
Today's Supreme Court, certainly, has taken a step back, holding that government action to battle race-conscious social discrimination must be color-blind (see PICS v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:40 am
See Bailey v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:20 am
Familiar tactics and arguments will be levied in forthcoming battles for medical record data access. [read post]
ITC judge didn't buy testimony for which Qualcomm paid a single expert $3-4 million in Apple dispute
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
(United States International Trade Commission) in September and in Munich (Munich I Regional Court) in October. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:30 am
He’s best known for Brown v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:58 am
Ever since the 1936 Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:16 pm
” The Court’s second round of review of the case, in Stern v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
As stated by Justice Cromwell for the Supreme Court, in Kerr v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
The UK Secretary of State for Justice, Kenneth Clarke recently released his government’s Draft Defamation Bill. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm
See Envirogas v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
The gist of the piece is that Hammer wasn’t a battle between laissez-faireists and Progressive supporters of national regulation. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
President Erdogan has stated that Turkey will continue battling the PKK until every last fighter is “liquidated. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:24 am
In its last major decision on the subject, in Ronnen v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
Federal law prohibits “depredation against any property of the United States” as well as robbing or attempting to rob “another of any kind or description of personal property belonging to the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
It is clear that politics in the United States frequently depart from norms of comity and respect. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am
He claims that U.S. training made the difference in a battle against the Islamic State. [read post]
