Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 40,926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
Donald Dean Budd was postponed until the Minnesota Supreme Court hands down its ruling on the constitutionality of the state's statute that criminalizes sexual conduct between a member of the clergy and someone receiving spiritual or religious advice from the minister. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
Related Posts: Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
., v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Spiers, Ambassador of the United States of America by the President of the United States of America, Ildeniz Divanlioglu, Director General of the Consular Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs by the President of the Republic of Turkey, Who, having communicated to each other their respective full powers, which were found in good and due form, have agreed as follows: CHAPTER I EXTRADITION SECTION I GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 1 OBLIGATION TO EXTRADITE (1) The Contracting… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:44 am
I discussed those dangers in a post last month (see: Empire State Building v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
In that decision, all nine judges voted to strike down the Separate but Equal standard, allowing state-sponsored segregation, that had existed since the Plessy v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:44 pm
Winding down our update of the first round of Case Watch opinions, the Virginia Supreme Court has finally released its long awaited decision in Tir Conaill Properties, L.C. v. 2401 Wilson, LLC, Record Number 090855. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:52 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 2:04 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 8:36 pm
Circuit in Noel Canning v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am
While the case raises the specific question of whether state courts may use state constitutional provisions to strike down regulations of congressional elections imposed by the legislature, the Court could answer the question more broadly to remove additional state-level checks on legislatures under the Elections Clause (with potential implications for the Electors Clause as well). [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
This way, eligibility for federal benefits would not differ from state to state. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 1:39 pm
Sincerely, Steven V. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:49 am
Law Review Article About Westbrook v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:28 pm
In Lobegeiger v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 9:25 am
., v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:58 am
Even if Treasury makes changes to these regulations, it is entirely possible that the courts will strike down some or all of the limitation. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
Following Brown v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:28 pm
In 2011, the Appellate Division held in State v. [read post]
