Search for: "State v. Favors" Results 4961 - 4980 of 37,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2021, 12:03 pm by John Elwood
After Saxon sued the airline in federal court under the FLSA, Southwest moved to dismiss in favor of arbitration. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court stated that the complaint would remain sealed until "this action proceeds further in the litigation process," at which time "the balance will shift in favor of full public access to the factual details of the complaint. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:38 am by Neil Wilkof
Add to this the alleged potential for "abuse" of discretion by the PTO director by virtue of the Supreme Court decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am by rainey Reitman
United States (SCOTUS) EFF CFAA Revisions – Penalties and Access (EFF) Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Reform (EFF)  Electoral Security: Election Security (EFF) Transcript Tarah: So in 2010, I was getting married for the first time. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
By that measure, 14% of judges’ individual decisions or votes—18% in state cases only—were favorable to Trump. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is not often that a court allows reargument, states that it misapplied the law, and reverses itself as took place in Orlando v Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene  Genovese & Gluck, P.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 6:50 am by David Adelstein
  Stated another way: ambiguities in insurance contracts will be interpreted in favor of the insured and against the insurer. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 5:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
According the complaint a liberal construction, accepting the allegations contained therein as true and providing plaintiff with the benefit of every favorable inference, we find that plaintiff sufficiently alleged a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (compare Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d at 1147-1148; Krouner v Koplovitz, 175 AD2d 531, 533 [1991]). [read post]