Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 11,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2021, 1:45 am
This year marks the 10th anniversary of the Court of Justice’s (CJEU) landmark judgment in Pepsico v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (C-281/10P). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:07 am
With SB 783, State Sen. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:26 am
May the rights which the Member States lay down pursuant to Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29/EC go so far as to enable users of the terminals to print out on paper or store on a USB stick the works made available there? [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
The book “organizes, analyzes and synthesizes all of the 48 UTSA-adopting states’ published court opinions (state and federal). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:45 pm
Whiting v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:32 am
The panel affirmed the district court's dismissal of the fraud claims, concluding that the statements at issue had correctly stated the terms of the deal. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 10:32 am
In Amcor Flexibles Singen GMBG v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:44 am
judgment in the case of Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT [2014] EWHC 1666 (Pat) (22 May 2014). [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:14 pm
In July, the General Court ruled in Case T-768/20 (Standard International Management LLC v EUIPO) on the importance of distinguishing between the place where hotel and ancillary services are offered and the specific place of use of the mark when assessing genuine use of EU trade marks. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:14 am
It is possible that both societies could each have managed the full portfolio of copyright and performers’ rights, if they were accordingly assigned, but it appears that these societies are meant to be responsible for different rights.COTT, established in 1984, states that their “main function is to manage and license collectively on behalf of music creators and their publishers…the performing and reproduction rights in their copyright music. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:52 am
Nelson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
The book “organizes, analyzes and synthesizes all of the 48 UTSA-adopting states’ published court opinions (state and federal). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am
It does appear however that there are two main areas where there is some ponding and undulation. 15. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am
It does appear however that there are two main areas where there is some ponding and undulation. 15. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:21 pm
Ronin v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Rather, the Constitution assigns main responsibility for deciding them to Congress, where, as Chief Justice Marshall explained in McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Potential progressive activists who might participate in political movements are as much, if not more, the target than those of us whose main ambition is to publish an article in Studies in American Political Development. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
In the main I would answer “no. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:53 am
In Battiston v Microsoft Canada Inc (“Microsoft”), an employee was wrongfully dismissed because his employer had failed to bring a harsh termination clause to his attention. [read post]
