Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am
Mary SchroederUnited States v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:51 am
” More commentary on Friedrichs v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
United States, Smith v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:18 am
The case is Kris Kaszuba, d/b/a Hollywood Group v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:12 am
They could also be in different states of the United States, CNRV, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
§ 11-1201 states that a “trade secret” is “information… that (1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:56 am
One can hope this marks a trend for all cases predicated upon such arguments. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:09 am
Dauray, 215 F.3d 257, 264 (2d Cir. 2000) (alteration and quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:48 am
Today marks an incredible moment for the State of Florida – with over 60 percent of votes in support during the 2018 election, Amendment 4 became Florida law. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:35 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:27 am
” Briefly: Mark Walsh has a first-hand account of yesterday’s oral arguments in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
