Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 16,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2012, 10:34 am
In Henson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The legal ground here is, at best, unsteady.An interesting precedent exists, however, in Janky v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:00 pm
State JurisdictionGrand-Isle Shipyard, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 11:48 am
California Coastkeeper Alliance v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am
A state many have a monopoly of information. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 6:53 am
This is discussed in a 1997, Austin Court of Appeals opinion styled, State Farm v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:52 am
This way they get on the ballot without having to petition, and will be guaranteed a substantial minority of the votes, as well as access to any debates. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:22 pm
There is actually a good deal of Supreme Court precedent on this point (the leading modern case is Village of Arlington Heights v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:01 pm
Nebraska v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:04 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:26 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of KansasOpinion Date: 9/17/09Cite: Oldham Graphic Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 1:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
Lodge (1982) through NAMUDNO v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
Bromfield v. [read post]
Judgement Darraj v. France (34588/07) Minor mutilated during identity check : violation of article 3
4 Nov 2010, 3:03 am
On September 15th 2010, the Committee of Ministers close the examination of the case Rivas v. [read post]
Judgement Darraj v. France (34588/07) Minor mutilated during identity check : violation of article 3
4 Nov 2010, 3:03 am
On September 15th 2010, the Committee of Ministers close the examination of the case Rivas v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
Rucho and Covington v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:10 am
See Ozaltin v. [read post]
