Search for: "State v. Outing"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 90,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Ctr. for Food Safety v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:57 pm
As a practical matter, the opt-out process would modify little and cost the state nothing; indeed the Commonwealth might benefit from the change. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:51 am
However, a case out of Washington State recently carves out another interesting exception. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:42 am
Additional Resources:Stacy M. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:53 am
” The Metts court pointed out that “the trial judge had never made an appearance in the case and had never examined the State’s files. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:30 am
In IRAP and Hawaii v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:57 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Knight v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
On August 3, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Masterson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Finding that even were the educator justified in removing the student from the classroom, his actions in locking the student out of the room in a state of distress and leaving him in the hallway without adequate supervision, violated school policy.The Appellate Division said that imposing a penalty of a 15-day suspension from employment did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Matter of Ghastin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 169 AD3d 507.The decision is… [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:52 am
" Aatrix Software, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Finding that even were the educator justified in removing the student from the classroom, his actions in locking the student out of the room in a state of distress and leaving him in the hallway without adequate supervision, violated school policy.The Appellate Division said that imposing a penalty of a 15-day suspension from employment did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Matter of Ghastin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 169 AD3d 507.The decision is… [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 6:36 am
He gets the state verdict back, but the federal claim is gone.The case is Triolo v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 4:17 pm
Cadwalladr’s state of mind when she gave it. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Highlighting the similarities, the court pointed out that the Grünbaum heirs were already cognizant of their claim, akin to the circumstances in Bakalar v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm
Black sites and state secrets In United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
(David Kopel) So said the unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
