Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 4961 - 4980 of 71,792
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2020, 4:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in Immunex Corporation v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm by Josh Blackman
You stated the Supreme Court would have the final word as far as the lower courts are concerned. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm by Jana Grauberger and Stephen Wiegand
Under the proposed regulations, instead of relying primarily on net worth to determine whether a lessee must provide additional security, BOEM would primarily consider a lessee’s credit rating. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a decision of the district court that granted summary judgment to Lotte International America Corp. because Ezaki Glico’s cookie design was functional and not entitled to trade dress protection in Kaisha v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Marcus Evans (UK) and Janine Regan (UK)
  The case of Privacy International v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, the Secretary for State for the Home Department and the UK security and intelligence agencies (SIAs) (Case C-623/17) concerns the conditions under which SIAs may process communications metadata (i.e. traffic and location data, not message content) collected by telecommunications providers. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 7:55 pm by James Romoser
Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a longtime supporter of allowing the court’s proceedings to be televised. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:50 am by Ilya Somin
  In a post published yesterday, I explained why Amy Coney Barrett is unlikely to vote to strike down the entire Affordable Care Act in Texas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:02 am by Christopher G. Hill
” A recent case in Fairfax County, Virginia, Erie Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
After a detailed review of juror testimony, the court found that “[v]iewing the totality of the circumstances, the court finds that there is no indication that any juror concealed harbored bias from the court or the defendants. . . [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 12:22 pm by Eileen McDermott
The Court has consolidated the cases and limited the questions to question one and two in the United States government’s memorandum of July 22 in both Smith & Nephew, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]