Search for: "State v. South" Results 4961 - 4980 of 10,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 10:43 am
BP Plc, also in the US District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans).South Florida News online is reporting that local fish markets are concerned about the economic effects of the spill, and today South Florida attorney Spencer Aronfeld is expected to file a class-action lawsuit against BP, arguing the oil damage to fisheries in other Gulf states will have long-term negative affects on both the South Florida economy and environment.To read the… [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
His work places particular emphasis on Bonham's Case and a series of early South Carolina decisions striking down state laws. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:27 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
More Blog Posts: State Supreme Court Reverses Judgment for Defendant in Wrongful Death Claim, May 12, 2016, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog State Supreme Court Rules that Post-Mortem Misconduct by Doctor Is Medical Malpractice, Reverses Damages Award, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog, published June 13, 2016. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:22 am
  This reminds me of my favorite dentist story: friend of mine, when he was in the Midwest back in the day -- he was originally from suave, chic southwestern Minnesota but happened to be out in hicksville, somewhere in South Dakota -- was going out with this woman who was the ex-wife of a dentist. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Rejection Recommended of Bid to Require Fishermen To Pay South Africa $41 Million Restitution Under VWPA United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am by Jackie McDermott
“For any state that passes a law that violates the Constitution, and in particular Roe v. [read post]