Search for: "State v. Young"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 8,938
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
The district court’s order granting summary judgment in Carnes v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:28 am
In George v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 9:59 pm
(Orin Kerr) A recent case, United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
CBS supposedly sought to hire young, attractive females for the position. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:06 pm
The court notes that the Legislature has sought to protect young persons who have violated the criminal statutes of this State from acquiring the stigma that accompanies a criminal conviction akin to People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
The BIA in C-V-T stated that the factors that the immigration judge must consider when deciding whether to grant cancellation of removal to a lawful permanent resident are as follows: The positive factors are: Family ties in the United States, particularly ties to lawful permanent residents or U.S. citizens; Residence of long duration in the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 2:35 am
At a young age her father died, and she was separated from the rest of her family during the fighting. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 7:03 am
In the case, Pannell v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
He wrote in State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Circuit, in Sottera, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
Through its suit, GoldieBlox was seeking judicial confirmation that its commercial video, which features three young girls singing alternative lyrics to the the Beastie Boys' song Girls, while playing with a Rube Goldberg-style contraption, constitutes fair use as a parody of the original song.However, just days later, GoldieBlox changed its commercial to remove the Beastie Boys' song Girls and issued a press release directed at the Beastie… [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
She stated that during the initial visual comparison, the judge may disregard similarities on the basis that they are "too commonplace, unoriginal or consist of general ideas", before undertaking a detailed analysis of the works. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Ernst & Young LLP, 726 F.3d 290, 297-98 n.8 (2d Cir. 2013); Owen v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:52 am
Ernst & Young. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
Jones v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:13 am
This is followed by an instruction that a prominent statement printed in bold letters of at least 3mm in height stating “USE UNDER MEDICAL SUPERVISION” shall also appear on the label. [read post]
