Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 15,008
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:01 am
Shannon Togawa Mercer and Ashley Deeks highlighted the U.K. as a case study for how privacy-conscious states are regulating facial recognition software (FRS). [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:40 pm
An interesting case about libel and science; I will quote from the magistrate's report and recommendations in Santilli v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:06 pm
See McCleskey v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:12 am
In Plate v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:18 am
The 2018 Amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG) were unanimously adopted by the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
Evid. 801(c) and 803; Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 7:57 am
A federal judge previously dismissed the lawsuit in March 2017, Jonee Fonseca et al v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:58 am
’” For The Wall Street Journal, Eric Morath reports on a recent study concluding that “[l]abor unions could lose hundreds of thousands of members if the Supreme Court determines this spring [in Janus v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:00 pm
However, the BRI standard for AIA trials is different from the standard used in federal district courts and the ITC, which construes patent claims in accordance with the principles that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit articulated in Phillips v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 7:34 pm
U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-13. [read post]
9 May 2018, 6:14 pm
-H., 2000 WI 42, 234 Wis. 2d 606, 610 N.W.2d 475 and Stickles v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:00 am
Andersen’s recent study confirms this. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:01 pm
And in one old case, Beauharnais v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:50 am
Most views cluster around the conclusion I tend to share: the question whether the President can be compelled to testify was formally left open by United States v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
A description of applicable federal laws and policies, and applicable state laws, including new or proposed federal or state legislation or policies5. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:04 am
GOLO, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:30 pm
In addition, given the ascension of right-to-work laws and cases like Janus v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:13 pm
Die Grundlagen des klassischen Völkerrechts berührend, befasst sich die Studie mit der Frage, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen ein Staat gegenüber privaten Akteuren das in Art. 51 UN-Charta verankerte Selbstverteidigungsrecht ausüben kann und welchen Grenzen es insoweit unterliegt. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:38 am
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
