Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 4961 - 4980 of 8,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 6:04 am by Aaron Bruhl
United States, No.09-7408 - The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:13 pm
And the United States has rarely if ever had a better advocate. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 15-245Issue: Whether the district court has jurisdiction to expunge an individual’s criminal record on equitable grounds. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Brown in Oregon has ruled that the United States government’s No-Fly List is unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
Title 59 Chapter 27 is a content-based tax that violates the First Amendment; and 2) whether that tax passes intermediate scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:38 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Similarly, the preamble to the rule also states that “a petition with a requirement of any engineering degree in any field of engineering for a position of software developer would generally not satisfy the statutory requirement” as the petitioner may not be able demonstrate how the different fields of engineering would qualify the H-1B worker to perform the duties of software developer. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:09 am by Jason Rantanen
§ 141 (permitting “[a] party to an inter partes review … who is dissatisfied with the final written decision … [t]o] appeal the Board’s decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit”). [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am by Miriam Seifter
By defining the key statutory term “waters of the United States,” the rule determines, among other issues, which water bodies are subject to the act’s discharge limitations and permitting requirements. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:27 am
MALAYSIA INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING CORP.Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitNo. 06-102. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 7:50 am by Lindsay Offutt
” That provision states: “the term ‘Indian country’ … means (a) all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and, including rights-of-way running through the reservation. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:52 am by Katherine McCoy
Moreno On August 13, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) disapproval of revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (“SIP”) dealing with the state’s Flexible Permits program. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 5:52 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 271(f), it is an act of patent infringement to supply “components of a patented invention,” “from the United States,” knowing or intending that the components be combined “outside of the United States,” in a manner that “would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States. [read post]
8 May 2023, 10:38 am by Ranchod Law Group
  Every year, thousands of people file their I-485 application for adjustment of status in the United States, hoping to obtain permanent residency and, ultimately, citizenship. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:09 am by Suzanne Ito
Despite U.S. court’s dismissal of these cases, that the United States tortured and abused many men in pursuit of its so-called “war on terror” is not in dispute. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
United States, No. 06-0218 "Order holding that appellate counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to inform client of his right to file certiorari is affirmed where: 1) counsel was retained, not appointed, and thus the Criminal Justice Act does not apply; 2) petitioner's other arguments were without merit. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States Citizenship and Immigration Servs., 992 F. 3d 742, 744 (CA9 2021) (VanDyke, J., dissenting), the Government successfully opposed efforts by other interested parties—including petitioners here—to intervene in order to carry on the defense of the Rule, including possibly before this Court. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
  The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States applies on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]