Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 8,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2014, 9:14 am
I should add, in the interest of candor, that I worked on the brief and presented oral argument on behalf of the United States in Dewsnup v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
Mar. 4, 2014), the Supreme Court of the United States, in a 6-3 decision reversing the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, held that the whistleblower protection provision in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:14 am
United States, 816 F. 2d 647, 656 (1987) (stating the on-sale bar “does not lend itself to formulation into a set of precise requirements”). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:25 am
United States, in which the Court held that land exchanged with or transferred to the owners of private property under an 1875 law once again became their property when the railroad that ran across the property has been abandoned. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:00 pm
One of those actions had been commenced by a separate Plaintiff in the United States, and had been settled shortly before the Quebec authorization hearing. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:52 am
As discussed in previous blog posts, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Petitioner Halliburton’s argument to modify or overturn the fraud-on-the market presumption that the Court first articulated more than a quarter century ago in Basic v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:31 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; "On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court erred in denying his petition because his 'constitutional right to the effective assistance of trial counsel, under the [s]ixth and [f]ourteenth [a]mendments to the United States [c]onstitution, was violated.' [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
On March 4, 2014, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided its first case under Sarbanes-Oxley’s whistleblower protection provision, Section 806. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Core Wireless, on the other hand, is a non-United States corporation with one employee that exists solely to license its patent portfolio. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:32 am
(“Barnes & Noble”) seeks a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee to vacate its July 12, 2013 order denying Barnes & Noble’s motion to transfer the case to the District Court for the Northern District of California and remand with instructions to transfer the case. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 7:19 am
Since 1929, however, the State of Washington has allowed only one ferry provider, a private company, to operate on the lake and has prohibited Petitioners James and Clifford Courtney from operating an alternative ferry. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 11:11 pm
CASE: Marriage to US Citizen Green Card CLIENT: Indian LOCATION: Cleveland, OH Our client came to the United States from India. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:38 pm
In regard to damages, the complainant woman states that she is not getting her my son's child support payments from the support collection unit. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:46 am
The United States Supreme Court, in an opinion for a unanimous court by Justice Thomas, held that Article 12's 1–year period is not subject to equitable tolling and affirmed. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 2:11 am
He came to the United States as a K-1 Fiancé of a U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:06 pm
As an amicus, the United States argued that such intent might be implicit in the bilateral investment treaty at issue. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:54 am
Apparently the United States Marshalls had to forcibly enter his house to bring him to the hearing. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:55 pm
He came to the United States without the inspection and admission and was caught at the border. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:38 pm
On May 27, 1975 the United States Supreme Court declared that juvenile defendants are entitled to the protections of the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 12:58 pm
In Wurie, the United States is the petitioner; in Riley, the petioner is a criminal defendant. [read post]
