Search for: "U.S. v. Washington"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 11,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2018, 4:07 am
At Rewire.News, Imani Gandy remarks that in Husted v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am
In the Georgia Law Review Online, Nicholas Nunn discusses U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:11 pm
The time will be divided this way: the Court-appointed attorney, Richard Bernstein of Washington, D.C., will have fifteen minutes to argue against the Court’s jurisdiction, Montgomery’s attorney will have fifteen minutes to argue both points, an attorney from the office of the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 6:19 am
Case in point: Hartman v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 1:22 am
Durant, PLLC, a litigation firm based in Washington, DC. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:15 pm
As expected, the government argues that the most suitable vehicle for the Court's review is Case No. 14-1505, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:16 am
"In April, Texas' Seventh Court of Appeals, agreed in a case called Sutherland v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 6:00 pm
Durant, PLLC, a litigation firm based in Washington, DC. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
United States case currently before the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
In neither case did the Court address the question whether the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:17 am
Durant, PLLC, a litigation firm based in Washington, DC. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
” At Law.com, Tony Mauro reports that “[f]ive U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Snyder 14-571Issue: Whether a state violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:05 pm
That request, noted yesterday on the Court’s docket for the case of Fisher v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:31 am
Massachusetts, 557 U.S. ____ (2009). [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:34 am
That case is Uttecht v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 3:51 pm
McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984). [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
" Leon, 468 U.S. at 923 (citing Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
The first case today is Comcast v. [read post]
