Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 7,224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 3:36 pm
These investigations most often involve allegations of patent and trademark infringement. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:27 am
Since 1993, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) has pursued an “aggressive campaign” to free itself from oversight by and accountability to the courts. [1] At the same time, the USPTO has been just as aggressive in ignoring the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and related administrative laws that place responsibilities on the USPTO vis-à-vis the public. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:55 am
No funds appropriated, or otherwise made available, under this Act may be used by the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to carry out section 37 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (35 U.S.C. 156 note), including the flush sentence added to section 156(d)(1) of title 35, United States Code, by such section 37. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:55 pm
These investigations most often involve allegations of patent, trademark, and copyright infringement. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
By doing so, it puts United States law more in line with the patent laws used in other countries. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:55 am
By doing so, it puts United States law more in line with the patent laws used in other countries. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:03 am
This month, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) released the Eighth Edition of The Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (“TMEP”). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:01 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released two Federal Register Notices on October 7, 2011, seeking written comments and announcing two public hearings for two studies the agency is required to conduct under the America Invents Act. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:37 am
” (The opinion contained the ® symbol, but all I saw in TESS was a July 2011 application from someone who didn’t, on my admittedly casual inspection, appear to be the plaintiff.)Anyway, RPost sued for violation of the Lanham Act and California’s FAL/UCL by defendants Trustifi, Authentidate, and the United States Postal Service. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
It is 332 page exposition on the current state of China's labor laws. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office website indicates that MyGTLFuel.com registered for 'GTL Fuel" in February 2011 in the class for energy drinks, six months before Sorrentino himself registered 'GTL' for dietary supplement drinks and other meal replacements, which is still under review at the USPTO. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:58 pm
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) announced enhancements to its Electronic Trademark Assignment System (ETAS). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am
(PatLit) United States US General US Senator questions Constitutionality of ACTA (IP Watch) (Michael Geist) US IP rights holders hail new FTAs with Colombia, Panama, Korea (IP Watch) Telegram for the Federal Circuit: Electronic case filing is now available (Patently-O) US Patent Reform America Invents Act – Filing and disclosure strategies (IP Think Tank) America Invents: what do litigators need to know? [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 09 CVS 2582 (N.C. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:31 am
The first is by using a particular mark in trade or business and the second is by filing an appli-cation in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:31 am
An interesting side note to this story: I performed a search on the United States Patent and Trademark Office search page I noticed that the trademarks registrations for Orange Crush are listed as DEAD. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:03 am
Google (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Happy Halloween – Just in time for Halloween, a Seattle dispute over Screams.com domain name (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Now, only the United States may sue for statutory damages.A new private suit provision (35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:18 pm
" One of the reasons trade secrets are presently distinguishable from patent, trademark and copyright is that they are primarily governed as a matter of state law and, as most of you know, different states treat trade secrets and define them differently which sometimes leads to unpredictable outcomes for those seeking protections.One of our good friends at this blog is David Almeling at the O'Melveny & Myers firm in San Francisco. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division: On June 20, 2006, United States Patent No. 7,065,750 (the "'750 patent"),entitled "Method and Apparatus for Preserving Precise Exceptions in Binary Translated Code," was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
