Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE" Results 4961 - 4980 of 6,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2022, 2:18 pm by Kirk M. Hartung
Patent and Trademark Office (2009-2013); Judge Paul Michel, former judge on the U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:23 am by sierralit
If a trademark is not registered with either the Principal Register or Supplement Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, but a franchisor has file an application for a trademark, state business opportunity laws consider the application as not federally registered. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office over the office’s refusal to trademark the band’s name is before the Supreme Court this term in Lee v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 5:15 pm
Of course, Upper Deck never bothered to actually register the square hologram as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office until January 2009. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:34 am
Section 187 exempts officers and agents of the United States from these prohibitions. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
What role should the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s rules play in defining materiality? [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:23 pm
  Procedural History"Bimeda Research & Development Limited (“Bimeda”) appeals a decision by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, now known as the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”), in Ex Parte Bimeda Research & Devel- opment Limited, No. 2011-010507, 2011 WL 3754635 (B.P.A.I. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:54 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
  For example, the multinational pharmaceutical company Novartis AG entered into an access agreement with the Brazilian Association for the Sustainable Use of the Biodiversity of Amazonia ("BIOAMAZONIA") under whose terms BIOAMAZONIA received an upfront payment of $4,000,000 in return for supplying Novartis with 30,000 promising biological samples over a three-year period;  furthermore, should any of these samples lead to a drug that receives both patent… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:09 pm
What role should the United States Patent and Trademark Office's rules play in defining materiality? [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 11:53 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor) On Tuesday, June 29, 2010, I had the opportunity to sit down on the record with Nick Godici, the former Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Former Acting Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform  Act – Senate patent reform debate (Maier & Maier) (IPBiz) (Inventive Step) (Maryland IP Law Blog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patents Post Grant Blog) Patent reform – first-to-invent vs first-to-file debate (Patentology) (Inventive Step) (IPBiz) (Patents Post Grant Blog) (Inventive Step) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O)… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:39 pm
Patent & Trademark Office re-examine the ‘231 and ‘089 patents. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:38 pm by William H. Holmes
Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”); and (4) a publicity campaign by GE that is interfering with Mitsubishi’s business relationships and that Mitsubishi alleges has created a false and misleading impression that Mitsubishi’s wind turbines infringed upon GE’s patents. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
(Creative Commons) (1709 Blog) United States US General New IP enforcement plan from the US (Innovationpartners) Victory for US GI’s over Europe (Likelihood of Confusion) US Patents Filing of new false patent marking cases again picking up steam (Gray on Claims) USPTO to work with Google to make patent data available to the public (Patent Docs) The business method patent art units (Patently-O) USPTO must amend… [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:33 am by Brett Trout
Thompson appear to have both signed and submitted a legal document to the United States Patent and Trademark Office stating: “To the best of the signatory’s knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other… [read post]