Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 9,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2014, 3:57 pm
In Gilbert v. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 4:01 pm
", "what would happen if our competitors could also use it? [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 2:02 pm
In Neloms v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:41 am
Because of the level of pain associated with the injury, the supervisor agreed with the employee that she should work her way back up to her full shift (10 hours) gradually. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:08 am
On behalf of all of us at NCDD, thank you Lenny. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
The style of the Amarillo case is, Home State County Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
§506(d) Strip-Offs of Totally Unsecured Second Mortgages in Chapter 7: At the circuit level, the 11th Circuit stands alone in permitting Chapter 7 debtors to use §§506(a) and 506(d) to “strip-off” second mortgages when a first mortgage eats up all the value in a residence or other real property. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:24 pm
It had argued that because the court of appeals used its discretion to deny Dart’s appeal, the merits of the case at the district court level were not before the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
So if a doctor said it was necessary then it was...Now, the First District Court of Appeals for California has agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the IMR process.A date and time for the oral argument in Stevens v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 6:28 pm
” She expressly reached out to her supervisor, indicating she wanted temporary help using computer programs and remembering passwords due to her medication levels but her supervisor kept silent and walked away. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 10:10 pm
In Nelson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:52 am
Finally, in my role as reporter, I’ll tell you that the court granted most of ATL’s motion to dismiss, but held that parts of Counts I, III, and V survive. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:23 am
In Garay v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 1:23 pm
That statute lists alcohol as such a product, but plaintiff has alleged Four Loko was unreasonably dangerous due to the combination of high levels of alcohol and stimulants and the risk posed by stimulants that mask the intoxicating effect of the alcohol. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:15 am
The plaintiff (referred to in court documents as female, hence the use of feminine pronouns here) in Eure v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:41 am
Some blame the enormous levels of stress health care workers endure, coupled with long hours and emotional stresses. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
(It is not freely available, but he went so far as to write an article with Gregor Grant on the matter: The Protection Conferred by Product-by-Process Claims; Grant, Gregor; Smyth, Darren; European Intellectual Property Review (2010), volume 32, issue 12, p. 635-643). [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Although the issues and the balancing exercise will be materially different as between child protection issues in public law proceedings and private law financial cases, and although Y v Z was, on one level, very fact specific; its careful exposition of the potentially relevant factors and the likely approach of the court to questions of disclosure of evidence of criminality to the authorities is a useful reference point for cases with even quite different factual bases. [read post]
