Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 4961 - 4980 of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Respondents conceded that they are not connected to Petitioner in any way.Finally, the evidence established that SCHIEDMAYER is famous in the United States in connection with keyboard musical instruments. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
“The right to public access ‘serves to promote trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of its fairness.'” United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 5:30 am by Robert Loeb
Likewise, a court must simply accept the government’s assurance that a country accepting the detainee will not jail the detainee at behest of the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am by Eugene Volokh
In 2000, the United States Supreme Court upheld a law imposing a similar restriction on approaching within 8 feet of other person in certain public locations, but size matters. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
NRDC, No. 07–1239 (S.Ct., November 12, 2008) Secretary of the Navy Winter, right, and Admiral Gary Roughead depart the Supreme Court of the United States after Oral Arguments on October 8, 2008. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:30 am
The Court referred to the cases in Delaware that adopted United States Supreme Court’s definition of materiality, including recent Delaware disclosure opinions in the cases of In re Netsmart Techs., Inc. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:09 am by Charlotte Howells
Two recent decisions from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas (Lawson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
United Staffing Alliance, another ERISA case involving a claimed right to medical benefits. ** 06-1505, Meacham v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Thorsten Bausch
Secondly, patents of mediocre quality will generate additional economic costs, because they unlawfully limit free competition and may impose an additional significant burden on the courts of the member states. [read post]