Search for: "ACE LTD"
Results 481 - 500
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
It involves either an interference with the legal rights of an owner or a person with exclusive possession of land, including an interest in land such as an easement or a profit à prendre, or interference with the amenity of the land, that is to say the right to use and enjoy it, which is an inherent facet of a right of exclusive possession: Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd (1997) AC 655 687G–688E (Lord Goff citing FH Newark, “The Boundaries of Nuisance” 65… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:51 pm
(“GE”) and the Respondents are Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
It involves either an interference with the legal rights of an owner or a person with exclusive possession of land, including an interest in land such as an easement or a profit à prendre, or interference with the amenity of the land, that is to say the right to use and enjoy it, which is an inherent facet of a right of exclusive possession: Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd (1997) AC 655 687G–688E (Lord Goff citing FH Newark, “The Boundaries of Nuisance” 65… [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
In relation to “reasonable expectation of privacy” the Judge observed “the home address of an individual is information the disclosure and use of which that individual has a right to control in accordance with Article 8 of the Convention (see Green Corns Ltd v Claverley Group Ltd [2005] EWHC 958 (QB) at paragraphs 53 and 56). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:58 pm
However, the Lords decision in Marcic v Thames Water Utilities Ltd [2004] AC 42 means that where no negligence is alleged, not even the owner of the property would have an Art 8 claim, let alone the other occupiers. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:32 pm
Ltd [2001] 2 WLR 992 concerned an application for an injunction by Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones to prevent Hello magazine from publishing photos of their wedding. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
His Lordship felt there were three basic propositions of law to consider and apply: (a) it was not enough to give rise to a duty of care that harm was foreseeable (Dorset Yacht Co v Home Office [1970] AC 1004); (b) the law did not ordinarily impose positive duties to protect others (Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd 1987 SC (HL) 37; (c) the law did not impose a duty to prevent a person being harmed by a criminal act of a third party merely because such harm was foreseeable… [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Local authorities have been prevented from suing for defamation since Derbyshire v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534 HL. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:29 am
The arguments on appeal The Claimant argued that Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386 was clear authority for the proposition that a term of uncertain duration cannot create a lease and that consequently, the entire occupancy agreement was void (including cl.6). [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:25 pm
Ltd. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
The appellant derived this “necessary implication” test from the context of human rights or the principle of legality referred to in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 and R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [2002] UKHL 21, [2003] 1 AC 563, where the question was whether section 20 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 overrode legal professional privilege, a common law right… [read post]
Shoulda Woulda? Alberta Court of Appeal Considers the Mental Element of the Tort of Civil Conspiracy
19 Apr 2012, 4:44 am
Berryland Book, where it said: “The leading authority on intention and knowledge in this context is OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:10 pm
In 1894, in a case in which a newspaper been sued for libel after criticizing the way a colliery owner housed its workers, the Court of Appeal had held that the presumption of harm applied to companies as well as to human beings (South Hetton Coal Co Ltd v North-Eastern News Association Limited [1894] 1 QB 341 (CA)). [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for repealing the Clean Power Plan and replacing it with the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, which loosens federal carbon emissions standards. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am
David Richards J held that this would therefore have involved a significant departures from two fundamental common law principles: first, the principle of open justice requires that trials are conducted in public; and, second, the principle of natural justice includes the right of a party to know the case against him and the evidence on which it is based (relying on Al Rawi v The Security Service [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) [10]-[13] (Lord Dyson); and later, in respect of open justice, to Scott v… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:33 am
Raymond McDougall - In late June, Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. announced major estimates of resources and “geological potential”. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 11:20 am
Hybrid Tech – On January 31, 2020, Hybrid Tech Holdings LLC, Hybrid Technology LLC, and Ace Strength International LTD paid $29 million to resolve bid-rigging allegations relating to an auction for a loan made under the Department of Energy’s Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing loan program. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:56 am
He defended the last two cases brought for blasphemy in the UK against Salman Rushdie (R (ex parte Choudhury) v Bow Street Magistrates Court [1991] 1 QB 429) and Gay News (R v Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617). [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
Ltd. [read post]
