Search for: "ADAMS V DEFENSE" Results 481 - 500 of 1,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2021, 12:18 pm by Stephen P. Halbrook
John Adams defended the British soldiers who shot five colonists to death in the Boston Massacre of 1770, claiming self-defense. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Heller, which recognized a Second Amendment right to have a gun for personal self-defense, extends beyond the home. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am by Pace Law Library
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 1984.) 123 Harv. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  The latter, discussed here, held that the Adam Walsh Act classifications couldn’t be applied retroactively to people who committed their crimes before its effective date of January 1, 2008. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:35 pm by Walter James
Tuma was adamant that during these calls he never asked them to do anything illegal. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
Jonathan Stempel of Reuters, Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy, and Adam Liptak of The New York Times preview tomorrow’s arguments in Florida v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:18 am by Mary Whisner
Georgia: Not an End, but a Beginning Hugo Adam Bedau, Gregg v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:35 pm
The ACLU is calling its Guantánamo effort ''The John Adams Project.'' Adams, who became the second U.S. president, defended British soldiers at their trial for the 1770 Boston Massacre. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
Williams (discussed here), holding that the Adam Walsh Act was punitive, and couldn’t be applied retroactively to people who committed offenses prior to its effective date. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
Does the state’s emphasis on the so-called “hosting rule” mean the state is abandoning its defense of the law’s content promotion restrictions? [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
” In a tradition dating back to John Adams’s defense of the Red Coats who opened fire during the Boston Massacre, attorneys are ethically obligated to continue representing a client even if the cause is unpopular, or if they may lose other business. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court issued a unanimous opinion in Shaw v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:55 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: Adam Liptak reports in The New York Times on Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
On Wednesday, the court heard argument in Salman v. [read post]