Search for: "APPLICATION OF SMITH" Results 481 - 500 of 7,573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2009, 12:02 pm
§ 22B-1, deals with indemnity agreements and therefore was not applicable to this case. [read post]
20 May 2013, 3:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Professor Carlton Smith (Cardozo) and Professor Keith Fogg (Villanova) published a letter to the editor in today's Tax Notes. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 3:56 am
Applicant Smith & Vandiver argued that, because Cali is the name of a city in Colombia, the proposed mark does not solely signify the State of California. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:51 am
Stop the Drug War.org: National Poll Finds Support [53%] for Welfare Drug Testing by Phillip Smith: A Rasmussen poll released this week found majority support for automatic drug testing of new welfare applicants and lesser, but still high, levels of support for drug testing people already receiving welfare benefits. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:57 am
Stop the Drug War.org: National Poll Finds Support [53%] for Welfare Drug Testing by Phillip Smith: A Rasmussen poll released this week found majority support for automatic drug testing of new welfare applicants and lesser, but still high, levels of support for drug testing people already receiving welfare benefits. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:21 am by Howard Friedman
Hobby Lobby wholly undermines Rasul by holding that the pre-Smith Supreme Court case law does not restrict the scope of “person[s]” protected by the RFRA, which Congress intended to exceed the scope of constitutional protection as set forth in the pre-Smith case law. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:02 pm by Barry Sookman
I came early to hear a presentation on CASL given by Kelly-Anne Smith, legal counsel at the CRTC. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
Habitual Criminal: Smith claimed that the application of the habitual criminal statute in his case was unconstitutional because the jury was allowed to consider crimes he committed after the instant offense. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:26 am by Tom Smith
 I like to think I try not to make the mistake of going passive in risky situations, but on reflection, I can think of as many times when I did this as when I did not.I like applications of statistics to football. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:31 am by Dennis Crouch
Chisum has recently turned his attention to the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act and penned a new article titled Priority Among Competing Patent Applicants Under the American Invents Act. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:44 am
As the spring semester winds down around here and admitted applicants begin to finalize their plans for next fall, I thought I’d take the opportunity to sit down with Martha Minow, the Jeremiah Smith, Jr. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Lisa Baird
On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 12:00 PM ET, Reed Smith will be hosting “Digital Health 101”, a CLE webinar covering: Federal and state health care regulatory and reimbursement issues, including fraud and abuse implications and insurance coverage for digital health devices and services Applicability of federal and state privacy laws, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), California Consumer… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:13 pm by Lawrence Solum
Smith School of Business) has posted Beyond Chafee: A Process-Based Theory of Unclean Hands (American Business Law Journal, Vol. 47, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
These changes will provide for more efficient processing of reissue applications and improve the quality of patents, in accordance with the intent of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. (5) In order to implement the conforming amendment made to 35 U.S.C. 251 in Section 4(b)(2) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, the Office is also proposing to amend the rules to permit an assignee of the entire interest who filed an application under 35 U.S.C. 118 that was… [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 4:12 am by SHG
Further, we disagree with the dissent that, because defendant received notice of the first application for a buccal swab, the People were not obligated to provide notice of any further such applications. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:03 am
 This paragraph is considered to be a response by the EPO to the common view among patent practitioners that the EPO’s stance on added subject matter can be too strict [readers may recall mention by Christopher Rennie-Smith, here, that some users of the system have noted the Boards of Appeals' "bewildering or incomprehensible attitude" towards added subject matter], with the result that applicants can be overly restricted in the amendments that they are… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:54 am by WIMS
Nick Smith challenges the United States Department of Agriculture's determination that Smith had converted 2.24 acres of wetland on his property and that he is, consequently, totally ineligible for program benefits. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:28 am by Jon Sands
  The 9th employs AEDPA deference to conclude that the state's appellate court decision was  neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. [read post]