Search for: "Ace v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 1,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Based solely on her request, ACS issued a notice to the mother stating that the subsidy had been “suspended” effective April 14, 2016 at her request. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Based solely on her request, ACS issued a notice to the mother stating that the subsidy had been “suspended” effective April 14, 2016 at her request. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:55 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
A similar view was reached by the Divisional Court in R (P) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] 1 WLR 2009 and by Blake J in R (G) v Chief Constable of Surrey Police [2016] 4 WLR 94. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:53 am by Joseph Koncelik
  Complicating any effort to simply get rid of climate change regulation of the power sector was the Supreme Court prior ruling in Massachusetts. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 5:39 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The lawsuit was filed in State Court and ACE had the case removed to Federal Court where ACE claimed the case against Kirn was sued for the purposes of defeating diversity jurisdiction and was thus, an improper joinder. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am by HANNAH WILCE
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The test in Bonnard is a much higher threshold than in claims for interim injunctions in privacy claims, where the applicant only need establish that his claim is more likely than not to succeed at trial (Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee ([2005] AC 253). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am by CECILY WHITE
The judgment of Calveley v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [1989] 1 AC 1228 was found to be instructive in this regard, where it was held that a Chief Constable did not, in principle, owe a duty of care to protect the economic and reputational interests of his officers in respect of the prosecution of an investigation or disciplinary proceedings brought against them. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia argues that “Kavanaugh’s 2014 dissenting opinion in SeaWorld of Florida, LLC v. [read post]