Search for: "Adams v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 2,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm by Sex Crimes
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an infamously murky 2006 decision on Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:25 am
After observing that Stall had no criminal history and properly determining that the Sentencing Guidelines advised a range of 57-71 months of imprisonment, the district court sentenced Stall to only one day of incarceration and a ten-year period of supervised release.1 In this appeal, the United States contends this "non-custodial" sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a bank-fraud case, rejecting Lawrence Shaw’s argument that he could not be found liable under the federal bank-fraud statute if he only intended to defraud a third party, not the bank itself, and remanding for consideration of questions about the jury instructions. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Taha &Sohaib Khan, Charity Disparity: The Challenge of Applying Religious Law on Zakat in the United States, (Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2018).Michael A. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Without H.B. 20, which would outlaw such censorship, the EU may end up determining what gets said on social media worldwide, including in the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 4:12 am
The United States Constitution was crafted in a remarkable era of politics, philosophy, and deliberative debate. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:01 am by Amanda Rice
  However, The BLT’s Tony Mauro quotes two “judicial ethics experts” who argue that Code of Conduct for United States Judges does not apply to Supreme Court justices, and that even if it did, there is nothing “ethically wrong with O’Connor has done. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]