Search for: "Adoption of Parker" Results 481 - 500 of 597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2021, 3:36 pm by familoo
If you don’t hand the nosey parkers and the dangerous stalkers of this world the information in the first place, they won’t be able to access it and do bad things with it. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Christopher Sagers
Under a statewide health care policy adopted in 1941, local governments in Georgia may establish “Hospital Authorities,” which are quasi-public non-profit entities that can own and operate health care facilities. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
You will need to click here and register before viewing the full text online of any of the cases listed below U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 31, 2008 Parker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 8:39 am by David Oxenford and Keenan Adamchak
  Parties challenging the decision are arguing that the statute that requires the FCC conduct Quadrennial reviews of the ownership rules compels the FCC to make changes in the rules based on competition, and competition has certainly changed since 1996 when the current rules were adopted (see, for instance, our articles here and here), so some relaxation of the rules is necessary. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 8:00 pm
On age parameters, FYI, I am still using the same formula: beginning at age 36 (my age the year I adopted the formula), I divide my age by 2, and add one year. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Resh, No. 17-432, in which the Court is poised to decide whether to further extend the equitable tolling doctrine it first adopted in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
” The California Air Resources Board unanimously adopted a rule that all commercial trucks sold in California must be completely zero-emission by 2045. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 12:11 pm by Goldberg Jones
But it was his adopted parents in Kansas, Jonathan and Martha Kent, who truly shaped the man he became. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2020 authored by a select number of our many expert contributors. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
My own view – lacking formal training in philosophy – is that one can be a laissez faire capitalist without adopting, or even fully understanding, Rand’s foundation. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Alex Phipps
And in our view, to adopt the State’s position that the observation period requirement is not violated when a subject “chews” something during the period would lead to absurd results and have bizarre consequences because it would mean, for example, that a subject could engage in the following activities not listed in 10A NCAC 41B.0106(6) moments before the taking of breath samples: chewing gum—presumably including nicotine gum—or tobacco or food that is spit… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:45 am by Ken Shigley
(The following President’s column appeared in the December 2011 issue of the Georgia Bar Journal.) [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Consequently, so too is the MCRI Defendants' cross-appeal. 07a0343p.06 007/08/28 Parker   v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The finding of the Parker Commission was overturned by the Federal Court in 2004 in Stevens v. [read post]