Search for: "Advocates v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 12,945
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
IP may have centred on rights of individuals, but its ownership and teaching is likely to become ever more collaborative and collective.The editors state the need for sharing best practice as a key driver for this book. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:34 am
The case is Family Equality v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Hensley v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:38 am
Without lawful status youth are under constant threat of detention and deportation, resulting in separation from their families and communities in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:16 am
On the basis of fundamental conflict of laws principles and policies, this article advocates that the fraud issue should be characterised separately as a tortious/delictual issue. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
Finally, as the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Johnson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
From Weaver v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
From Magistrate Judge Robert Norway's report and recommendation in Frank v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
Though the article is set to appear in print sometime this month, it might not beat the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. [read post]
