Search for: "Ali v. Wells" Results 481 - 500 of 640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2013, 12:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
The new brief by attorneys for Ali Hamza Suliman Ahmad Al Bahlul — prosecuted as a propagandist for Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden — is a direct attempt to employ the Court’s 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
 India Following defamation proceedings against a senior advocate who made statements about a well-known business family, the High Court of Delhi ruled that statements made by lawyers during the course of judicial proceedings must be subject to absolute privilege. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The Supreme Court released its decision on the centuries-old Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am by Ritika Singh
 Check out Wells and Raff’s recap, as well as Peter Margulies’ thoughts, and, of course, our Al Bahlul Case Page. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm by David Ryan
The commission is called to order with four defendants present (Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, and Mustafa al Hawsawi) and one conspicuously absent (Walid bin Attash.) [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg only disclosed that many of Facebook’s third-party fact checkers are expected to vet adverts as well as user content for misinformation during a debate in Congress over the new cryptocurrency project, Libra. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the case of Ali Hamza Suliman Ahmad Al Bahlul v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm by Elina Saxena
The Guardian tells us that aid convoys are expected to arrive in seven besieged areas, including “Madaya and Zabadani, whose citizens have been starving to death under a siege imposed by forces loyal to Bashar al-Assad; as well as Fua and Kefraya, which are besieged by rebels. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:17 am by Benjamin Bissell
Wells Bennett linked us to video of yesterday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Hill, Ali Breland reports that the “tight control that tech companies have over how consumers use their products may be in jeopardy” following the court’s decision this week in Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark International, Inc., in which the justices ruled that U.S. and overseas sales of a product extinguish the patentholder’s rights to sue for infringement. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
(a) The doctrine of willful blindness is well established in criminal law. [read post]