Search for: "American Sales Corporation v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 715
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Court held that, while federal courts have jurisdiction over all of these suits, Section 10(b)’s substantive prohibition reaches only fraud in connection with the "purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:05 am by admin
  ARTICLE V: COVENANT FOR ASSESSMENTS     …     Section 4. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:33 am by Sanaz Asgharzadeh
  MBUSA sales in the United States consisted of 19% overall with 2.4% of sales in California, which are significant market shares that DCAG would not want to lose. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Of course, whether or not the share transfer actually took place in the United States and whether the transfer actually effected the sale of the ship are questions of fact for later determination. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm by Bexis
“[E]ven regularly occurring sales of a product in a State do not justify the exercise of jurisdiction over a claim unrelated to those sales. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
CHODIKOFF Toronto: Irwin Law, c2008 KE5875 .T394 2008 See Catalog Business ethics CORPORATE GOVERNANCE / EDITED BY LAWRENCE E. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
CHODIKOFF Toronto: Irwin Law, c2008 KE5875 .T394 2008 See Catalog Business ethics CORPORATE GOVERNANCE / EDITED BY LAWRENCE E. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
The German and and Swiss Synthes entities have no presence in "the United States or the State of Texas. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
(See, among a zillion examples, anti-miscegenation laws after Loving v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:56 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
McNamara secured the first race discrimination verdict in the United States against a real estate franchise for failure to award a sales agency to an African-American in Tyler v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:54 am by randal shaheen
Justice Ginsberg wrote for the three dissenters, finding that McIntyre’s interactions with the United States market as a whole were sufficient grounds to find jurisdiction in New Jersey.The dissent believed that the case presented an example of “marketing arrangements for sales in the United States common in today’s commercial world. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm by Charles Kotuby
Related posts:The United States Supreme Court to Take a Fresh Look at Personal Jurisdiction Today, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in two... [read post]