Search for: "Application of Barrett"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,069
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
During his four years in office, Trump placed three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – on the court, cementing a 6-3 conservative majority. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:12 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett filed a concurrence, which was joined by Justice Brett M. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
Steve Bannon Indicted After Refusal to Comply with Jan. 6 Committee Subpoena MSN – Devlin Barrett, Jacqueline Alemany, and Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 11/12/2021 Former White House adviser Stephen Bannon was charged with two counts of contempt of Congress after refusing to comply with a subpoena from the House committee investigating the January 6 attack on the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 7:04 am
The piece is titled, In Texas Abortion Case, Kavanaugh and Barrett Caved to Judicial Supremacy. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:40 pm
So we can assume that this will be across the board equally applicable as the Firearms Policy Coalition says to --to all constitutional rights? [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm
To be sure, even in those contexts, I think the Court's definition of novelty is far too expansive, treating as novel cases that ought to be deemed straightforward applications of existing law. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:17 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I have described the basis for equitable jurisdiction in Young in very similar terms: In Young, the government was regulating the railroad company. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 5:09 pm
Justice Barrett wrote in part:When this Court is asked to grant extraordinary relief, it considers, among other things, whether the applicant “‘is likely to succeed on the merits. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:47 pm
" When this Court is asked to grant extraordinary relief, it considers, among other things, whether the applicant "'is likely to succeed on the merits.'" Nken v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:18 pm
But Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh expressed reservations. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
Justice Barrett wrote: When this Court is asked to grant extraordinary relief, it considers, among other things, whether the applicant "'is likely to succeed on the merits.'" Nken v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
In his four years in office, Trump put three justices — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett — on the court, guaranteeing a solid 6-3 conservative majority for the foreseeable future. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
Courts in New York have defined “proper cause” to require applicants to show a special need to defend themselves. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
Shortly before Sept. 1, when S.B. 8 was scheduled to take effect, the providers came to the Supreme Court with an emergency application seeking to block the law. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
The narrower rewrite asks whether the state’s denial of the gun owners’ applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 pm
But Kavanaugh and Barrett can call their bluff. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:28 pm
And Justice Barrett clerked for Justice Scalia in OT 1998. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 9:24 pm
Daniel Sieveking and Elizabeth Barrett of Spruson & Ferguson will provide a summary of various criteria regarding patent term extension (PTE) eligibility and the PTE application process in Australia, and also provide practical recommendations arising from recent decisions, including two recent decisions of the Australian Federal Court: Ono Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:06 am
(Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote about the order here.). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 12:32 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett echoed this idea. [read post]
