Search for: "Application of Barrett"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,010
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2021, 4:02 pm
Only four justices voted to grant the application to lift the stay: Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Barrett would have lifted the stay. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 8:16 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett also filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch joined. [read post]
Justices argue over text (and ceviche) in ruling that Alaska Native corporations are “Indian tribes”
27 Jun 2021, 6:41 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined all of Sotomayor’s opinion, while Justice Samuel Alito joined most of it. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 28280-20 A man v Isle of Wight County Press, 2 Privacy (2019), 3 Harassment (2019), 6 Children (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), 11 Victims of sexual assault (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication. 02716-21 Savant v Mirror.co.uk, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 5 Reporting suicide (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation.… [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 9:51 am
The dissent consisted of one conservative (Barrett) joined by two liberals (Sotomayor and Kagan). [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
In his application for tax-exempt status, Hostetter said American Phoenix Project would not directly or indirectly engage in political campaigns. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:25 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a dissenting opinion that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett joined. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 12:02 pm
Smith, however, remains the applicable law in many cases. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:36 pm
The majority opinion was authored by Justice Barrett. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
This leaves Justices Roberts and Barrett who did not join the no new COA prong of the Opinion. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 5:02 am
The WaPo says there is some tentative good news regarding Amy Coney Barrett... that she may be in the Roberts' wing of the conservative court and not the Alito/Thomas wing. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
The City’s antidiscrimination policies, therefore, did not constitute “generally applicable law. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
Again, it was obvious that conservatives would dislike some liberal judges' application of a presumptive religious exemption regime, just as it's inevitable that liberals would dislike some conservative judges' application of such a regime. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 3:37 pm
” Barrett notes that the court has used a “more nuanced” approach than strict scrutiny when generally applicable laws affect speech or assembly. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:12 pm
" In an instance, I recognized that Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh were unwilling to use strict scrutiny to review burdens on the free exercise of religion that are neutral and generally applicable. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:37 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, similarly left open the possibility of reconsidering Smith in the future. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm
Ten weeks ago, acting on an emergency application for injunctive relief in the COVID-19 case of Tandon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 5:10 am
But Roberts said the city’s policy fell outside of Smith because it was not generally applicable. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:30 am
Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion and was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Justice Barrett concurred, joined by Kavanaugh and Breyer. [read post]
