Search for: "Asbestos Claimants" Results 481 - 500 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2009, 7:09 am
  The company could isolate asbestos litigation because all asbestos claims were brought against the Trust. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Samuel Issa ­charoff of New York will argue for respondents Cascino Asbestos Claimants and Jacob C. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:11 am
On the claimant's appeal, the Third Department AFFIRMED the penalty and disqualification, holding: A determination that a claimant has violated Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a will be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Losurdo v Asbestos Free, 1 NY3d 258, 266 [2003]; Matter of Kestler v Old Castle Callanan Indus., Inc., 46 AD3d 957, 958 [2007]). [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 2:57 am
” The trial court concluded that the insurer had failed to meet its burden in showing that pending asbestos claims fell within the “products aggregates” of the subject insurance policies, and concluded that the claimants were entitled to coverage under the “operations” provision. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
HIPAA: Defendants Get Access To Asbestos Claimants' Medical Records, In re Asbestos Prods. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 2:39 am
This means a decision is unlikely until 2010 leaving the market and claimants in a state of uncertainty until then, although the possibility of a further appeal to the House of Lords cannot be ruled out. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:20 am
On 11 March the Scottish Parliament voted to pass the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill, previously reported here, which is intended to restore the right of claimants in Scotland to obtain compensation for pleural plaques. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
  "It is not unusual for a claimant in a mesothelioma case to receive more than $2 million in settlement from the various defendants. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:20 am
  The Appellate Body's reversal of the panel's findings in the Asbestos case was a pretty clear statement on the matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:43 am
Thorpe to impose a 524(g) bankruptcy to resolve its asbestos liabilities. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Asbestos Corp. of Am., 480 A.2d 647, 651 (Del.1984), the state has never adopted medical monitoring. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:09 am
  In that case, an out of state expert was alleged to have provided medical care to asbestos plaintiffs in a hotel room and later expert opinion based on that encounter. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 5:53 pm
Rather, the court ruled that this language limited any individual claimant from arguing that subsequent exposures to asbestos should give rise to a new “occurrence. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 4:36 am
In response, the General Assembly developed a system in which claimants must meet certain prima facie requirements in order to maintain tort actions that involve asbestos claims. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
The case involves an asbestos company, Johns Manville, that had been implicated in a class action suit involving approximately 16,000 people, who claimed damages relating to asbestos poisoning and exposure. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:22 pm
The cases arise out of the Johns-Manville asbestos cases. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 8:22 pm
Supreme Court decided Friday to determine whether the bankruptcy court can bind claimants of a chapter 11 debtor’s liability insurer. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:32 pm
In 2002, Petitioners sought to enforce the court's orders when certain asbestos claimants tried to evade the confirmation order by suing Travelers directly in so-called "direct actions. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:06 am
As David Owsiany notes in a short paper (PDF) for the Buckeye Institute, Ohio has gone a fair distance already toward asbestos reform by way of legislation restricting recovery to claimants with actual medical indications of disease. [read post]