Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins" Results 481 - 500 of 899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  The mentally retarded were also shielded from execution by the 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Henry Oliver
When the House of Lords gave the Home Secretary permission to arrest and detain people indefinitely during World War II (Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1) Lord Atkin gave a powerful dissenting speech: “In this county, amid the clash of arms, the law is not silent. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Jackler and Bowie v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that the execution of those with mental retardation is unconstitutional; more on Atkins v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Verdi v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP ; 2012 NY Slip Op 01243 ; Decided on February 14, 2012 ; Appellate Division, Second Department  and Schurz v Bodian ;2012 NY Slip Op 01235 ; Decided on February 14, 2012 ;Appellate Division, Second Department  both tell us: "The Supreme Court properly, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, since the defendants failed to make… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
Nick Owens, a Sunday Mirror reporter, denied trying to obtain the confidential medical information of celebrities from undercover filmmaker Chris Atkins. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:00 pm by blogarbadmin
Atkins) for appointment of arbitrators and eventually to S. 34 (See Venture Global v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:23 am by lawshucks
  Check out Barusch’s most-recent Dealpolitik column (linked above), and some related materials: Martin Marietta Materials’ S-4 launching the takeover attempt (Skadden’s Peter Allan Atkins, Eric L. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:40 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that the execution of those with mental retardation is unconstitutional; more on Atkins v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:14 am by CJLF Staff
., who had challenged the timing and use of the jury in adjudicating his claim of death penalty ineligibility under Atkins v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:52 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
As to the subjective prong, Trigilio and Casadio observe that the Court’s cases since Atkins v. [read post]