Search for: "B. Sullivan" Results 481 - 500 of 1,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2015, 10:30 am by Tom Smith
And one of my actual Senators, the inimitable B. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:03 am by David Post
I’m hopeful that this latest decision — the second time (see Sullivan v Government of USA [2012] EWHC 1680 (Admin)) that a U.K. court has found that U.S. civil commitment procedures violate basic human rights — though from a foreign court interpreting foreign law, will add to the weight and persuasiveness of the constitutional challenges to these schemes. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (b) Noncommercial use of name/likeness—protected. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Sullivan Farms II, Inc.; the Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center; Learning Tree Properties, LLC; Malka Rosenbaum; Sheindel Stein; Winterton Properties, LLC; and Commercial Corner, LLC (collectively the “Plaintiffs”) alleged that defendants are working together to prevent Hasidic Jews from moving into the vicinity of Bloomingburg, New York, a small village in Sullivan County with a population of about 400. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am by Ben
We did not grant Kim Davis any rights to use 'My Tune -The Eye Of The Tiger" wrote Survivor frontman Frankie Sullivan on the band's Facebook page. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:24 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Sullivan, but it would seem to be no small service to an accused that they get a prompt appeal. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:37 am by Pearl Griffin
Oakley Ave Chicago, IL 60643 Survey Date – 11/25/14 Type B violation for violating one or more sections: 300.660a)b)1) and 300.661. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:01 am
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove "actual malice" to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:01 am by Lee E. Berlik
In the landmark case of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, the Supreme Court established the rule that a public official must prove “actual malice” to prevail in a defamation action based on a statement relating to his or her official conduct. [read post]