Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 481 - 500 of 191,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2010, 10:40 am by structuredsettlements
Now that the Spencer v Hartford settlement has been finalized and distribution checks have been mailed perhaps the scaremongers "firing guns into the sky" from the left wing of the settlement... [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:14 am by traceydennis
Pankina v Secretary of State for the Home Dept;  Malekia v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Junaideen v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Sankar v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2010] EWCA Civ 719; [2010] WLR (D) 158  ”The immigration rules could not lawfully incorporate provisions set out in another document which had not… [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:27 am
Caldarelli v Judge for Preliminary Investigations of the Court of Naples, Italy [2008] UKHL 51; [2008] WLR (D) 274 “Extradition of an Italian fugitive had been properly sought as an accused rather than a convicted person where he had been found guilty of an offence in his absence and sentenced to imprisonment but his trial was not under Italian law finally completed until the appeal process was concluded. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:49 am
R v R (Video Recording: Admissibility) [2008] EWCA Crim 678; [2008] WLR (D) 95 “A video recording of an interview given had been was properly admitted as evidence in chief at a criminal trial pursuant to a special measures direction made under s27 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, notwithstanding that no notification had been given by the Secretary of State under s18(2) of the Act that such measures were available. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm by Simon Gibbs
He has been kind enough to allow the Legal Costs Blog to host a copy. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:52 am by Peter Bert
This post does not deal with the ICJ’s judgment in Germany v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 11:54 am by B.W. Barnett
 It's not enough that he was convicted of a sex offense which requires registration as a sex offender, but now he gets 25 years in prison for failing to update his registration within 7 days of an expected move even though he was evicted from his home.The 10th Court of Appeals (Waco), in Ford v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:37 am by webmaster
The stage has been set for the California Supreme Court’s first major ruling interpreting AT&T v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
The post Collin College Prof Reinstated; Had Been Fired for Advocacy of Union + of Removing Confederate Monuments appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:52 pm
  Oral arguments have been completed for this term of the Court; Bell v. [read post]