Search for: "BENNETT v. STATE" Results 481 - 500 of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
I once got in an argument with a group over whether or not some states still executed prisoners by firing squad. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
Indeed, suits brought by unreasonable Plaintiffs still percolate through our court system.Today, dear readers, we revisit the case of the dangerously defective bra.Take for example, the very recent Bennett v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:17 pm
See this ILB entry from earlier today for two of them. a third, granted with opinion Jan. 9, is Elmer Bennett v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm by Holly Brezee
The post How to Attract and Retain Employees During the Great Resignation: Part 1 – Options appeared first on Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:29 am by Douglas Berman
It has now been more than 12 years since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am by Nabiha Syed
Bennett, consolidated with McComish v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In McKinney v Bennett, 31 AD3d 860, the Appellate Division held that the appointing authority was not required to read all 1,228 pages of the hearing transcript and each document submitted, citing Matter of Taub v Pirnie, 3 NY2d 188. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In McKinney v Bennett, 31 AD3d 860, the Appellate Division held that the appointing authority was not required to read all 1,228 pages of the hearing transcript and each document submitted, citing Matter of Taub v Pirnie, 3 NY2d 188. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83 (30 June 2011) Appeal from: Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 723 See also: Innovation Patents Flop Like Stunned Mullet Infringement – claim construction – functional claim – whether ‘includes a pivotally moveable floor’ encompasses a mechanism in which this element is insufficient to perform a claimed function – meaning of ‘to allow’ … [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]