Search for: "Barrett v. Failing"
Results 481 - 500
of 666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:50 pm
Justice Barrett is new, but Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been serving on the SCOTUS for some time already and they're going to look at the issue, not the party. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:53 pm
Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
Buckley v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Adams & Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Sevilla, No. 07-1105 Sentence for conspiracy to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, cocaine base is vacated and remanded where, when a district court fails to address a defendant's colorable argument for a lower sentence under 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a), and the defendant fails to object, the argument is nonetheless preserved for appeal under a standard requiring meaningful consideration of the 3553(a) factors. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
Moyle v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:47 am
ShareDuring Tuesday’s argument in Santos-Zacaria v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:51 pm
The Supreme Court’s stumble through the City of Chicago v Fulton opinion is no exception to this rule. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 3:46 am
Sure, the report was unsatisfying because it failed to nab the justice (or his wife named Ginni) you’re certain did it. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 6:53 am
(There is one citation to Clinton v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:03 pm
Wickliffe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:32 am
Illinois v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:25 am
Lopez v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm
As the Supreme Court held in Bush v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
DST typically comes with a global and a domestic threshold, and applies only to those who meet both, with "local heroes" typically failing to meet the global one.While both VAT and DST are charged as a percentage of sales, VAT is a consumption tax and DST is meant to be a tax on (huge) profits.Therefore, VAT is meant to be ultimately paid by consumers (as an indirect tax), while DST should be paid by "GAFA" (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon).Australia is a special case:… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Cruz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:38 pm
A. v. [read post]
