Search for: "Barrett v. People"
Results 481 - 500
of 869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm
But in the wake of the court’s June decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
The Supreme Court today took the narrowest and simplest route to upholding an obscure tax provision in Moore v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm
Bush v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
Cuomo (2020) and Tandon v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
We see this discretion on full display in yesterday's Firearms Policy Coalition ruling.The court begins by determining that the carrying of guns by 18-to-20-year-olds falls within the text of the Second Amendment--concluding that people under the age of 21 fall within "the people," identified in the Second Amendment's, "right of the people to keep and bear arms. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm
But after Justice Barrett's confirmation in October 2020, the strategy shifted. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm
They do not overrule a decision. ] In Moore v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
Kavanaugh, Raymond Kethledge and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:31 am
Montana Eighth Judicial District and Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:40 am
I close the op-ed with this thought: Since Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 7:26 pm
Third, in promoting self-regulation, such immunity reconciles two seemingly conflicted goals: the need to limit the availability of objectionable content to minors and preserving the robust exchange of ideas enabled by the internet (see Law Professors' Amicus Brief, Barrett v Rosenthal, November 22, 2004). [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
I am grateful Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett stuck to first principles. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:02 am
INS v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Cutting to the chase, I agree with Amy Howe's assessment (on SCOTUSblog) of yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:34 am
Barrett v. [read post]
