Search for: "Battle v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 3,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:14 pm by Shardha Rajam & Mihika Poddar
On June 4, 2018, the Supreme Court of United States of America decided that the freedom to express religious beliefs would trump the right to equality. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:50 am by John LeBlanc
  Today, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and then returned the case to the U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Paoletti
The Court’s decision in the case leaves open the question of whether the United States can subject the thousands of individuals awaiting a final judicial decision on their applications for immigration relief to prolonged civil detention. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:24 pm by Bridget Crawford
Virginia was a watershed civil rights case in which the United States Supreme Court declared Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statute unconstitutional in 1967. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm
As co-blogger Will Baude points out, today the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit became the first federal appellate court to strike down a state law banning same-sex marriage since the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:57 am by Karen Hoffmann
 To look at it, you would never guess this place is the epicenter of the coming battles over judicial review of immigration detention in the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am by Isabel McArdle
The Government of the United States of America -v- O’Dwyer, Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Read judgment It seems appropriate, on the day when Wikipedia shut down for 24 hours to protest against US anti-piracy legislation, to talk about piracy (in the copyright sense) and what role human rights law has to play in the perpetual battle against it. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
Since Kernzer’s “casino services” were clearly rendered outside the United States, Kerzner had to rely upon an exception to the territoriality principle to claim that its use of the Atlantis mark outside the United States gave it trademark rights in the United States..With respect to one noted exception to the territoriality principle – described in International Bancorp, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am by Lauren Valkenaar (US)
Procedural History We have been following the critical twists and turns of this litigation which began in 2008 and included a trip to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am by Lauren Valkenaar (US)
Procedural History We have been following the critical twists and turns of this litigation which began in 2008 and included a trip to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 12:40 am
Q: Does the First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantee an attorney the right to wear whatever he or she wants to wear in court? [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Charlotte Law Library
Throughout the controversy, debaters referenced the United States Supreme Court Case of Plyler v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]