Search for: "Blake v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
The dissent argued based on BLAKE and DUDA, that once a violation of 240(1) is shown a plaintiff's conduct can't be held as a matter of law to be the sole proximate cause of his accident, stating; "Since we believe that the record contains factual issues regarding the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action, we respectfully dissent. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm by Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.
In May of 2023, in an unpublished District III Wisconsin Court of Appeals case also out of Marathon County entitled Henchey and Blakely v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
State (Judge Najam writing) and Sanders v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
”  Molly also rounded up early coverage and commentary on yesterday’s four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Adam Feldman
United States, Merit Management Group v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Friday 23 October, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment of R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
If this is giving you a feeling of queasy familiarity after Justice O'Connor's prescient Blakely dissent, you are not alone. [read post]